- Why the Democratic National
Committee wants to co-opt the Occupy Wall Street Protesters -
Why would former US House Speaker and legislative airhead Nancy
Pelosi go out of her way to embrace the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protesters?
Why would civil rights movement icon John Lewis attempt to address the OWS
group in Atlanta’s Woodruff Park? Why would President Obama praise these groups
even after hundreds were arrested in New York City?
Tea Party Rally in Washington, DC Image via Wikipedia |
Publicly, Democrats deny that the Tea Party had any effect
on the 2010 elections and will soon disappear. No one really believes Democrats
are that stupid and recalcitrant regarding reality. Having failed to destroy
the Tea Party movement, though slandering it so that the movement’s popularity
has decreased, the Democrats want a left-wing movement to counter the Tea
Party.
Whipped in the 2010 elections, Democrats want a Tea Party of
their own; some tame version they can co-opt and use to mobilize voters in the
2012 elections. Enter the OWS people and some Democrats are salivating at the
opportunity to control a movement that could be labeled “spontaneous”.
There are two significant problems for the Democrats. First,
they have started to believe their own press releases about the Tea Party,
buying the lie that the Tea Party is a centrally-controlled creature of the
Republican Party. That’s not the case. In fact, the Tea Party has had a large
impact on the GOP rather than the reverse. Personally, I believe those changes
were for the better because they refocused the GOP on smaller government and
lower taxes. Those two things were arguably missing from the GOP over the past
15 years or so.
The second problem for the Democrats is that they assume the
OWS groups simply need to be directed by someone who knows better. I don’t
necessarily believe that the OWS people will bend their knees to the arrogance
of the Democrat central planners. They have their own agenda and while that
agenda is apparently unknown to the mass protesters, the leaders have made demands
that reflect the agenda of their central committees.
Unless the OWS leaders make an ill-advised Faustian bargain
with the Democrats, the Democrats must be willing to accept and openly endorse many
of the communist-based ideas of OWS. While the facts are that those beliefs are
closer to Democrats’ current beliefs in wealth redistribution than they
profess, the public acknowledgement of those principles will still shock the casual voter.
In the end, the leftists fears of the Tea Party may lead to actions
causing a terrible setback for the Democrat Party in the United States. Democrats
seem to be risking everything to maintain a failing President and a do-nothing majority
in the US Senate in 2012. They perceive a counter to the much-hated Tea Party as a necessary step, even if they risk political ruin.
by Ken Carroll
You can also comment on this column on Peach Pundit.
by Ken Carroll
You can also comment on this column on Peach Pundit.
I don't think the Dems are looking at OWC (or any of the other O's) as counter-Tea Party. I think they looked at the rabble and realized that's their base! The rabble that looks to the Nannies-in-DC for all their answers. And handouts.
ReplyDeleteThe big donors (funny how those seem to be the very folks OWC is so against) are firmly in place. But, the small contribs are falling off. The rabble is the small contribs. How to get them back? How to insure their votes? The large bloc that helped put this administration in place.
Easy. Go public in support of them, whether you actually believe anything they're screaming or not. It's a brilliant piece of political strategy. And if there's one thing the Chicago pols know, it's political strategy.