Showing posts with label Georgia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Georgia. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Dear Yankee Pundits: I Apologize

Dear Yankee Pundits (And you know who y'all are),

Please accept my humble apologies. I was wrong and so I will make a real apology. A real apology restates the offense without any euphemisms or diminishing comments or excuses. Here is my offense. A mere two days ago, in "Romney's Southern Problem: The "M" Word", I wrote this:

I can see Romney winning Iowa or at least finishing second in Iowa. He should win his neighboring state of New Hampshire; anything else would be a major upset. As for South Carolina - listen to me, well-meaning Yankee pundits - it's not going to happen. It's the "M" word.
Cobb County courthouse in Marietta
Cobb County, GA Courthouse - Image via Wikipedia


What? "Mormon"? No, get real; you guys are far too quick to project your prejudices on others. There are members of the Church of Latter Day Saints all through the South and while they may not be ultra-active in politics, they are viewed as being good people and good neighbors. They are walking examples of the "family values" that the Republican Party endorses so heartily. Mitt Romney's "M" word problem is Massachusetts.

Friday, December 23, 2011

The Second Democrats' Lie About Voter Fraud Refuted

Previously in this series: The First Democrats' Lie About Voter Fraud Refuted

While it's not necessary to read the previous installment in this series, it will help with some background information. There are two states, Georgia and Indiana, that currently have photo voter ID. So why do Democrats not refer to the actual vote results? I'm a native Georgian and a current resident of the Peach State, so I'll refer to Georgia's voter ID law that has already been tried and tested.

Lie #2a: Voter fraud does not exist . . .

English: Boxes of challenged ballots sorted by...
Challenged ballots
Image via Wikipedia
Not so fast. According to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, hundreds of voter fraud cases are prosecuted in Georgia alone every year. Just one month ago 12 Democrats in Brooks County, Georgia, were charged with committing voter fraud using absentee ballots in 2010.

Democrats will, I'm sure, point out that photo voter doesn't help with absentee ballot fraud; completely overlooking clear proof that the desire to commit voter fraud exists. And, knowing the desire exits, would we make the mistake of believing that those who would steal elections would stop at absentee ballots?

So what was the beginning of catching the Democrats? Officials reviewed the high number of absentee ballots cast in the election. Without real voter ID requiring a photo ID, more of the fraud would have been committed face-to-face with no way to stop it. An ID is required to pick up an absentee ballot from the Registrar's office.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

The First Democrats' Lie About Voter Fraud Refuted

- The facts you need to argue the case for Photo Voter ID, Part One -

There are things that Democrats want you to believe about voter fraud and about the drive for photo voter ID laws by the states. Are any of those things true? In a word: No.

GI voting in Guantanamo
Ballot casting
Image via Wikipedia

To date, eight states have passed photo voter ID laws. I live in Georgia, one of two states that has conducted elections under the law. The numbers and facts destroy the arguments of the progressives.


The reality of life under a photo voter ID is very different from the self-serving helping of fear-mongering Democrats have manufactured. Briefly, here is the first lie, followed by the truth.


Lie #1: Photo Voter ID is discriminatory and will suppress all votes, but especially minority votes.

The Truth is in the numbers: Compare the Georgia vote levels of the 2004 and 2008 elections and the 2006 and 2010 elections. The more recent election of each pair used the new voter ID laws. If the Democrats had been right, vote totals for both minorities and whites would be lower. After Georgia implemented its new voter identification requirements, the number of votes cast increased across the racial spectrum, but increased the most among minorities.


Monday, August 8, 2011

May You Live in Interesting Times

Georgia State Capitol building in Atlanta, Geo...
Georgia State Capitol Building
Image via Wikipedia
Let's start with what we know about the bond rating issue and how it might affect the state of Georgia. Frankly, at this moment, it's not much.

Standard & Poor's (S&P) had reduced the bond rating of the federal government from AAA to AA+ while Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings, apparently satisfied with the recent budget agreement, have allowed the US to retain their highest debt ratings.

Georgia is one of only eight states to have earned the highest debt rating from all three services - at least for now. It remains to be seen if S&P will be willing to rate individual states higher than the federal government. It may depend upon how much of a state's AAA rating is based upon backing from the federal government.

Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Caylee's Law Would Be Just That - A Law Just For Caylee

It seems that some well-meaning legislators in my home state of Georgia are considering legislating and enacting "Caylee's Law" to avoid an occurrence similar to the recent case in Florida. The law would make it a felony for parents, caretakers or legal guardians to fail to report a child missing within 24 hours of the time they become aware the child is gone.

As you probably know from the ad nauseum coverage and analysis of the Casey Anthony trial in Florida, Caylee's mother (Casey) failed to report her child missing for a month. Many of the "legal experts" and analysts believe that Ms. Anthony was found not guilty of murder because of a lack of physical evidence directly caused by the amount of time it took to find her daughter's body. In essence, some believe Ms. Anthony's failure to report her daughter missing allowed her to literally get away with murder.

If Florida had a version of Caylee's Law on the books would it have mattered? It certainly wouldn't have mattered for Caylee. Whoever killed Caylee wasn't deterred by Florida's death penalty, so an additional, lesser penalty would not have an effect. And that brings us to the crux of the matter.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Did Georgia Governor Nathan Deal Damage GOP Presidential Chances?

The Georgia Republican convention was held in Macon this past weekend and while the controversy in Georgia does not appear to have national implications, it does. In fact, the controversy that caused some hard feelings here in the Peach State may become a national issue.
Nathan DealImage via Wikipedia
Georgia Governor Nathan Deal

In Georgia, current Governor and former US Representative, Nathan Deal managed to offend a lot of his fellow Republicans by inserting himself squarely into the race for the Georgia Republican Party (GAGOP) Chairman's race. In some states this may be common, but in Georgia - which did not elect a Republican governor until 2002 after 131 consecutive years of Democrat governors - this is not acceptable. The GAGOP had discovered that state governors are not necessary to run a state party.

Governor Deal had already angered many Georgia Republicans when he endorsed Tricia Pridemore during the GAGOP Chairman's race. Incumbent Sue Everhart and third candidate Shawn Hanley were not amused, but those really offended were the party activists who felt that Governor Deal clearly crossed a line. For a sitting governor to attempt to influence the outcome of a party election made many people uncomfortable.

Governor Deal already has a bully pulpit and it looked to many GOP grassroots activists that the governor was attempting to take theirs. More galling, was the implied insult that he - a man who had never shown real interest in the state party - knows more about what is best for the party rather than the thousands of party activists.

On Saturday, when Governor Deal deviated from his address as governor to endorse Mrs. Pridemore from the dais, the boos were no great surprise to anyone but the governor. Eventually, Mrs. Everhart was re-elected and most delegates and alternates were impressed with Mrs. Pridemore and Mr. Hanley. It was a good day for the party, except for the governor.

After a contentious 2010 GOP gubernatorial primary, followed by a more contentious run-off, a contentious state convention could not be a good thing. Three strong candidates for GAGOP Chairman is a sign of the success of the state party. Rancor added when a sitting governor involves himself in that race is a very bad thing. Then there is the question of why Governor Deal suddenly involves himself in party politics. I have yet to hear a reasonable explanation from the Governor or his staff.

And now, President Obama's campaign has declared Georgia in play for the 2012 election. Polls indicate this may be true and the President's people have already added a re-election headquarters and staffed it 18 months prior to the next election. Do I think the Obama campaign has a chance of taking Georgia? No, I don't. Do I relish the idea of facing an incumbent president with a divided state party? Again, I can't say that I do, because we hold elections for a reason. We don't know what will happen.

Why were delegates so upset with their own governor? The sad truth is that what is best for a state party seldom coincides with what is best for an elected official in the long run. A governor with too much influence in the state party structure can cause real harm to the state party.

So, will the Georgia GOP be united in the face of our opponents? We shall see, but the involvement of Governor Deal in no way strengthened the GAGOP and may have created stress fractures that were unnecessary.

There are several victims of this change. One will be the Republican presidential nominee who will be forced to spend more time and money in Georgia than should have been necessary. Others will be local and congressional  GOP candidates who may find it more difficult to raise funds and receive fewer volunteer hours from local Republicans focusing on the presidential race.

All three GAGOP chairman candidates are saying the right things and openly encouraging their supporters to unite and get ready for 2012. I hope this happens, but I wonder if the enthusiasm and focus shown in 2010 will be on display next year. If it isn't it will certainly affect the allocation of GOP funds which will affect how marginal states swing and therefore, the selection of the our next president.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, February 14, 2011

The Jim Marshall Farewell Tour, Robo-Calls and Other Political Mysteries

The Jim Marshall Farewell Tour

Welcome back, my friends,
To the show that never ends
We’re so glad you could attend
Come inside, come inside.
– Karn Evil 9 First Impression by Emerson, Lake and Palmer

The third month of the Jim Marshall Farewell Tour is now well underway with no end in sight. Marshall’s eight years of Congressional service weren’t exactly the stuff of legends, so why the big fuss? After all Democrat Marshall just lost a popular election to Republican Austin Scott.

At this rate, the celebration of Marshall’s relatively short Congressional career may continue into 2012. Then the question will become, “Ummm, isn’t this campaigning?” Redistricting may take care of that question, but apparently many residents of Macon, especially the editorial board of the Macon Telegraph, are jonesing for a resident US Representative. I’m willing to lay odds that wish won’t be granted within this decade.

On the bright side, Marshall is receiving praise for his professional and helpful attitude in the transition of the GA-8 Congressional offices and constituent services. This is a good thing.

On the other hand, In a single story, The Macon Telegraph flubbed both the Warner Robins physical address of GA-8’s new congressman, Austin Scott, and the telephone number for Scott’s Tifton office. The correct Warner Robins address is 230 Margie Drive, and the correct Tifton phone number is 229 396-5175. Everyone makes mistakes, but combined with their editorials and the flubbed election coverage (to Scott’s detriment), the continued errors are beginning to look like a pattern. Only liberals can manage to use incompetence as a weapon.

Mystery Robo-Calls

Last week many Georgians received robo-calls reminding them that “most Georgia counties” were conducting their mass precinct meetings on Saturday, February 12th and that all Georgia voters should attend. Most people receiving the automated calls assumed that the calls were paid for by the Georgia GOP. They weren’t.

This explains a couple of obvious mistakes. For example, less than 20 Georgia counties had their mass precinct meetings in February. The remainder – counties with a population under 80,000 as of the 2000 census - will have their meetings on March 12th. In addition, the call encouraged all registered voters to attend the meetings, not as the GOP Georgia Call to Convention states: “. . . residents who are legally registered to vote and believe in the principles of the Republican Party are urged to participate in this process.” No word yet on who paid for the robo-calls. Honest mistakes or something a little more sinister? Either way, it’s Georgia politics as usual.

High-Speed Rail in Georgia?

While I love the idea of high-speed rail in Georgia, unless the state government indulges in widespread mass-discount lobotomies, it shouldn’t happen. We don’t have the population density to support mass transit rail and we don’t have the need for high-speed rail. If the needs were there, then private companies would provide it.

We don’t need to spend money to build a public service that will cost us more money every year. The mystery here is why anyone would seriously consider the state building a rail system. When the rail enthusiasts call, “All aboard!” just remember that the trestle down the track is out and the state can’t afford to fix it.

James Clapper: Director of National Intelligence or Human Oxymoron?

From the “Never trust a man named after an ‘As Seen on TV’ product” department comes Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Clapper proclaimed, "The term Muslim Brotherhood is an umbrella term for a variety of movements. In the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried al-Qaeda as a perversion of Islam.”

If I were to buy this claim, then I would expect to see large numbers of Christians and Jews as members. I’m betting there is not a Southern Baptist wing of the Muslim Brotherhood or an Orthodox Jewish wing or a Hindu wing. I’m betting they are pretty much all Muslim and pretty much all anti-Israel and pretty much all fans of Iran, and to quote the Eagles from Victim of Love, “I could be wrong, but I’m not.”

A spokesman for Clapper – they weren’t going to let Clapper near a microphone twice that day – later said that Clapper meant that the Muslim Brotherhood was willing to work through secular political system. look out Michael Phelps, because in Clapper’s little world everything that swims is a fish.

The truth is that for a Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper is certainly lacking intelligence. You can take that either way and be right.
Blog Directory