Admittedly, congratulating Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DWS) for her recent behavior amounts to praising your pup for leaving an unusually large pile of crap on your carpet, but when the towering pile of doggie doo is actually larger than the dog himself, it's at least noteworthy. When it comes to crap, Schultz is a scatological genius.
Schultz continues to blame the Tea Party for causing the shooting of Arizona Representative Gabby Giffords. Despite overwhelming and undisputed evidence to the contrary, DWS continues to appear on national television and lie. In the hands of the left, truth becomes a victim, expendable in the quest for the one thing leftists' prize most: power.
If you actually believe that Schultz cares about finding answers, then I suggest you consider something. One year ago yesterday, I asked a simple question that I believe continues to make an important point.
After a year, we know that Loughner was mentally unstable, that he was not a part of any movement, that he did not even listen to the news or talk radio. Loughner was simply not political; he was just crazy.
Just like us, Wasserman-Schultz knows this. She's the opposite of Loughner; DWS is all about politics and while she is reprehensible, she's not crazy. And that is why she continues to blame the Tea Party for Loughner's shooting of Congressman Gabby Giffords. It is all about political advantage.
DWS (Pixels are free but I hesitate to waste them on her full name) continues to remind me of why I so strongly dislike the left. Not only do they lie, but it is a foundation of their politics. When the truth reveals you to be bereft of any viable ideas, then the options are change or prevaricate like a pallet. DWS regularly lies like a rug, making her unworthy of the tiniest modicum of respect - but there is even more.
Normally a leftist would rush to defend the presumed shooter, Loughner, and offer her defense of the mentally unstable who commit violence. Loughner; however, comes between DWS and her prey, the Tea Party. One could argue that Loughner cannot help his behavior, as I believe a court will find; while DWS certainly can.
Then there is the reason that DWS is truly more vile than Loughner. While proclaiming her "friendship" for Gabby Giffords, she uses Giffords near-mortal wounding to make political points. I am sure Giffords has some real friends and I am equally sure that DWS is not one of them. The left has no shame and never will for they do not care for humanity, only power.
For now, DWS has indeed produced a mountain of fecal material that dwarfs her political importance. It is not praiseworthy, but it is noteworthy. In addition, let it not be said that I can find nothing good to say about people: Schultz does have an amazing smile - just like the other contemptible, carrion-consuming crocodiles.
 |
| Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) Image via Wikipedia |
Schultz continues to blame the Tea Party for causing the shooting of Arizona Representative Gabby Giffords. Despite overwhelming and undisputed evidence to the contrary, DWS continues to appear on national television and lie. In the hands of the left, truth becomes a victim, expendable in the quest for the one thing leftists' prize most: power.
If you actually believe that Schultz cares about finding answers, then I suggest you consider something. One year ago yesterday, I asked a simple question that I believe continues to make an important point.
There was no mourning on the “Professional Left”, just gleeful expectation at the opportunity to undermine a particularly effective foe. When the editorialists of the New York Times launched their attacks on the TEA Party, the name of the vile, worthless shooter in Tucson was still unknown – as were his political beliefs. It didn’t matter and, frankly, I don’t believe it would have mattered, regardless of facts.
Here’s a reality check question for you: Since the Tucson shooting, have you seen more verbal attacks on the presumed shooter, Jared Loughner, or on the Tea Party movement? Just ponder that for a moment. Does this strike you as people upset that lives were violently taken, or does it appear more likely that political hacks are not allowing “a good crisis go to waste”?
After a year, we know that Loughner was mentally unstable, that he was not a part of any movement, that he did not even listen to the news or talk radio. Loughner was simply not political; he was just crazy.
Just like us, Wasserman-Schultz knows this. She's the opposite of Loughner; DWS is all about politics and while she is reprehensible, she's not crazy. And that is why she continues to blame the Tea Party for Loughner's shooting of Congressman Gabby Giffords. It is all about political advantage.
DWS (Pixels are free but I hesitate to waste them on her full name) continues to remind me of why I so strongly dislike the left. Not only do they lie, but it is a foundation of their politics. When the truth reveals you to be bereft of any viable ideas, then the options are change or prevaricate like a pallet. DWS regularly lies like a rug, making her unworthy of the tiniest modicum of respect - but there is even more.
Normally a leftist would rush to defend the presumed shooter, Loughner, and offer her defense of the mentally unstable who commit violence. Loughner; however, comes between DWS and her prey, the Tea Party. One could argue that Loughner cannot help his behavior, as I believe a court will find; while DWS certainly can.
Then there is the reason that DWS is truly more vile than Loughner. While proclaiming her "friendship" for Gabby Giffords, she uses Giffords near-mortal wounding to make political points. I am sure Giffords has some real friends and I am equally sure that DWS is not one of them. The left has no shame and never will for they do not care for humanity, only power.
For now, DWS has indeed produced a mountain of fecal material that dwarfs her political importance. It is not praiseworthy, but it is noteworthy. In addition, let it not be said that I can find nothing good to say about people: Schultz does have an amazing smile - just like the other contemptible, carrion-consuming crocodiles.
No comments:
Post a Comment